Clicky

Shipping News and Reviews

Trump doubles his $ 740 billion veto over the technical battle in opposition to Part 230

US President Donald Trump speaks after the swearing-in ceremony of James Mattis as Secretary of Defense on January 27, 2017 at the Pentagon in Washington, DC.

Almond Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump again threatened Thursday with a veto of a colossal defense bill if lawmakers fail to remove legal protections for social media companies.

Trump is calling for the repeal of a federal law known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects technology giants like Facebook and Twitter from legal liability for what is posted on their platforms.

On Wednesday, Trump described the provision as a "liability protection gift" for "Big Tech" and called for its "complete termination", as otherwise he would reject this year's National Defense Authorization Act [NDAA].

The president also said the move posed a serious threat to US national security and electoral integrity, but did not provide any further explanation. Trump has also said that Twitter, his favorite social media platform, wrongly censored him.

The President's problem with Section 230 became known this summer after Twitter added warnings to several of his tweets that alleged mail-in polls were fraudulent. Trump has still not allowed Democrat Joe Biden to hold the US presidential election.

The NDAA, which is usually passed with overwhelming support from both parties and veto-proof majorities, is a comprehensive defense law that approves $ 740 billion spending and outlines Pentagon policy.

The bill could have enough bipartisan support for Congress to override Trump's veto if he does well with his threat.

This year's legislation includes a 3% pay increase for US troops, a plan to rename military facilities with the names of Confederate leaders, and a number of other provisions. The NDAA, in its current form, does not contain any action related to Section 230.

This is not the first time the president has targeted the NDAA. Earlier this year, Trump said he would veto the measure if it included language for changing U.S. military facilities named after Confederate generals.

Continue reading: Trump says U.S. Army bases will keep Confederate names

Despite threats from Trump, lawmakers added the renaming provision to this year's NDAA.

This week, Trump's plan to "veto the NDAA outright" met swift bipartisan opposition as lawmakers work to pass the crucial bill needed to fund the military by the end of the year.

The recent hiccup of law between the White House and the Hill comes as lawmakers sprint to finalize a second pandemic stimulus bill.

“You're mad on Twitter. We all know. & # 39;

Legislators on both sides of the aisle pushed back Trump's 11th hour demand, saying the repeal of Section 230 was irrelevant to the passage of the Pentagon's top bill.

"First, 230 has nothing to do with the military," Senator Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, told reporters on Wednesday.

"We should abolish 230, but you cannot do that in this bill. That is not part of the bill," added Inhofe.

"I would hope he wouldn't really pull this off because the NDAA is critical," said Senator Mike Rounds, R-S.D., A member of the Armed Services Committee, according to The Hill.

Senate Majority Whip John Thune, R-S.D., Said Wednesday, "I don't believe the Defense Act is the place to litigate the fight against Section 230," The Hill said.

Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., Responded to Trump's tweet by saying that he would vote to override Trump's veto.

Meanwhile, some GOP senators, such as Senator Lindsey Graham [R-S.C.] And Senator Mike Braun [R-Ind.], Said they would support Trump's veto of the NDAA to repeal or reform Section 230.

Rep. Adam Smith, a Washington Democrat and chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said the president's fixation on Section 230 was due to his personal struggles with Twitter.

"To be clear, Mr. President, the repeal of Section 230 was not included in the House or Senate versions of the NDAA," Smith tweeted Wednesday. "You're pissed off on Twitter. We all know. You are ready to veto the defense bill on something that has anything to do with your ego and nothing to do with defense," added Smith.

Comments are closed.