Georgia Republican Senate Majority Leader Mike Dugan unveiled a bill on Tuesday Repeal of the apologetic absentee voting, used by 1.3 million Georgians in 2020, including 450,000 Republicans. According to his proposal, only a small subgroup of voters can vote by mail, e.g. B. Those out of town, disabled, or over 65 (a population that is heavily Republican). The small percentage of Georgians who can still cast ballots in the mail must have a witness signature on their ballot and enclose a copy of the photo ID required for access to a copier or printer. The new law would make Georgia one of the most restrictive states in the country for postal voting.
Republicans in Georgia authored all aspects of the state's already strict electoral laws and for many years promoted postal voting, particularly exempting postal voting from voter ID requirements because they did not want their own older and more rural voters to be disenfranchised become. You suddenly had a change of heart in November when, for the first time, more Democrats than Republicans voted by mail.
The Senate bill follows on from legislation introduced by Republicans at Georgia House last week Eliminate Sunday's voting, a measure that appears to be aimed at suppressing black voter turnout by targeting souls to the voting campaigns organized by black churches. The bill was called "Jim Crow in a suit and tie". (…)
THREE OTHER ARTICLES THAT WOULD READ
The gig economy is a vampire we shouldn't make peace with, by Hamilton Nolan. If organized work does not conform to the principle that employees are employees, we will all regret it.
The false conservative attacks on child loans, by Anne Kim. Joe Biden and Mitt Romney have interesting, important plans for helping working mothers. Conservatives say this will reduce the labor. Oh please.
Journalists and the impending superstorm of climate disinformation, by Andrew McCormick. When climate protection measures are on the table, the disinformation gets louder and louder. What should journalists do about it?
BEST COMMENTS • SAVED DIARIES
TWEET OF THE DAY
"The 2013 Supreme Court decision that gutted the 1965 Suffrage Act set in motion what many feared: the subjection of minorities, seniors and low-income Americans to unfair criminal barriers that prevented them from exercising their most basic right exercise as an American citizen. "
~~ Rep. Marc Veasey (2016)
BLAST FROM THE PAST
That day at Daily Kos in 2012– Poll: Americans Hate Regulation Unless They Know What It Does:
You have to give it to the conservative narrator Frank Luntz and his Republicans. Hammer a topic long enough and it'll take off. In this case, "job killing" rules that a large proportion of Americans think are terrible. Check out the latest Pew poll::
Currently, 52% say that government regulation of companies generally does more harm than good, while 40% believe that regulation of companies is necessary to protect the public interest. These views are similar to January 2008 before the financial crisis and the outbreak of the economic recession.
In March last year, opinions were more divided. 47% said regulating businesses is necessary to protect the public interest, while 45% said government regulation does more harm than good.
The biggest difference between last year and now is between Republicans, who are spoon-fed by their elected officials and who become increasingly entrenched in their fear and hatred of the government. Three-quarters of them agree that regulation does more harm than good, and 83 percent of self-identified Conservative Republicans say regulation is harmful.
But the numbers really start to fade as the survey breaks down the general idea of regulation and focuses on what the term actually means.